Academia.eduAcademia.edu
    GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS    (: ) Jan Cuppen, Bram Koese & Henk Sierdsema The dytiscid beetle Graphoderus bilineatus is heavily protected by national and international law. In  and  more information was gathered on the exact distribution and habitat in the Netherlands. A century ago the species was present in large parts of the country, but nowadays it proves to be restricted to peat bog areas in the provinces of Friesland, Overijssel, Utrecht, and Zuid- and Noord-Holland. The main habitat is ditches and canals with a width between . and  m, a depth between  and  cm, with clear water and a sparse vegetation. A distribution model predicts the presence of G. bilineatus with a probability of % or more in  kilometre squares in peat bog areas.  The water beetle Graphoderus bilineatus (Degeer, ) (fig. ) is one of the five Dutch beetle species protected by the European Habitats Directive and Dutch Flora- and Faunalaw . Notwithstanding the national and international protection status the distribution of G. bilineatus in the Netherlands was poorly known. The publication of Huijbregts () can be considered the first step towards a better knowledge. The discovery by the second author of a new population of G. bilineatus in the Nieuwkoopse Plassen in  was reason for the province of ZuidHolland to request -Nederland to start a study on the status of the species in this province. This project was carried out in  (Cuppen ). On request of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, the status of G. bilineatus in other parts of the Netherlands was investigated in  and  (Cuppen & Koese ). In this paper we provide general information on the species with detailed notes on distribution and habitat. posterior to the middle. The main colour of the dorsal side are pale yellow and black, the ventral side is pale yellow. The main differences with Graphoderus cinereus (Linnaeus, ) (fig. ) and G. zonatus (Hoppe, ) (fig. ), the two other Dutch Graphoderus species, are:  The pale yellow transverse band on the middle of the pronotum is distinctly broader than the black bands at the posterior and anterior margins; in the other species the black bands are broader.  The epipleura of the elytra show a distinct constriction at the level of the hind margin of the first sternite, which is absent in both other species; here the epipleura taper gradually from base to apex.  The light parts of the dorsal and ventral side are pale yellow, in both other species these parts are more yellowish with traces of orange, especially at the underside of the abdomen. Graphoderus bilineatus can be easily identified with the commonly used keys such as Schaeflein (), Van Nieukerken () or Nilsson & Holmen ().  Graphoderus bilineatus (fig. ) is a middle-sized dytiscid beetle with a length of - mm. The body is broadly oval with its maximum width  The development of the egg, three larval instars and pupa takes about -. month (Galewski    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     & Holmen , Hendrich & Balke ), but we did not find concrete records of this phenomenon. Figure . Graphoderus bilineatus. Foto Theodoor Heijerman. Figuur . Graphoderus bilineatus. Photo Theodoor Heijerman. ), from mid May to the beginning of October (Foster ). The presence of third instar larvae in the first decade of June even suggests an earlier start of reproduction than mid May in the Netherlands. Also, two couples of G. bilineatus, collected on  April  and  May  respectively, did not mate nor did lay eggs in captivity. However, it seems unlikely that these activities had already taken place. The larvae pupate on land, in a shallow pupation room under mosses, stones, wood, or plant debris, not far from the water’s edge. The lifecycle is probably univoltine, the adults dying after the reproduction period. Not much is known about hibernation, possibly on land (Hendrich & Balke  under reference to Foster ) as well as under water (Nilsson & Holmen ). Foster () suggests hibernation between dense, submerged moss carpets, but actual observations are lacking. The species is reported to be able to fly (Nilsson  Adults and larvae are carnivorous, feeding on small invertebrates. The larval morphology suggests that the larvae feed on cladocerans in open water (Galewski ), like the younger instars of Graphoderus zonatus (Denton ). When this resource is limited the young larvae spend more time near the bottom in search of other prey items, as do the older instars, which are also frequently hunting in dense submerged vegetation. Food preferences of the adult beetle are not known for certain as crop contents never have been investigated. The crops of Graphoderus cinereus contained, apart from tissue of higher plants, Chlorophycaeae and Bacillariophycaeae, remains of Crustacea, Ephemeroptera and Chironomidae (Deding ). However, only four larvae were investigated and possibly the vegetable matter is not consumed by the beetle itself but by its prey (e.g. ephemeropterans or chironomids).  The range of Graphoderus bilineatus reaches from Central-Europe via East-Europe to western Siberia and from northern Italy, Austria, Hungary and Romania to southern Scandinavia (fig. ; based on Foster ). Nilsson & Holmen () also give Spain, but the species is not mentioned in the Spanish list (Ribera ). In the surrounding countries of the Netherlands G. bilineatus is very rare. It is present only in some regions in Germany (Hendrich & Balke ), France (Bameul , Foster , Queney ) and Belgium (Bosmans & Van Stalle , Dopagne ). In England the species has not been recorded for nearly a century and can be considered extinct (Foster ). In Norway it is recently recorded for the first time (Olsvik ). Graphoderus bilineatus is rare in Denmark, but widespread in Sweden and Finland (Holmen , Nilsson & Holmen ). Large     ‒  2 3 4 Figure -. Habitus of three Graphoderus species, . G. bilineatus, . G. cinereus, . G. zonatus. Collection Naturalis Leiden (). Photos Roy Kleukers. Figuur -. Habitus van drie Graphoderus-soorten, . G. bilineatus, . G. cinereus, . G. zonatus. Collectie Naturalis Leiden (). Foto’s Roy Kleukers. • Determination of the potential distribution area in the Netherlands • Finding reliable characters to separate the larvae of Graphoderus species populations are known from the south of Scandinavia, Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (Hendrich & Balke ). In West- and CentralEurope the species seems to have declined in the second half of the th century (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Balke , Huijbregts ). Despite this decline, new populations have recently been discovered in this area, e.g. in the surroundings of Bordeaux (Bameul ), Bremen (Haesloop ) and in several nature reserves in the Netherlands (Huijbregts , Cuppen , Cuppen & Koese ). In this paper we will focus on the first goal, distribution and habitat. The results with respect to the different sampling techniques are presented in a second paper (Koese & Cuppen ), the development of the distribution model in a third (Sierdsema & Cuppen ). The study of the larvae is still in progress and will be published later.    The main goals of the project were: • Description of the current distribution and habitat of Graphoderus bilineatus • Determination of the best sampling procedure (macrofauna net versus bottle traps) Period and investigated areas The survey on Graphoderus bilineatus took place in the years  and . In total  samples were taken (distributed over  localities,  x kilometre squares and  x kilometre squares).    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Aanwezig Zuid-Holland Rest van Nederland   Afwezig   Table . Number of kilometre squares investigated in  (province of Zuid-Holland) and - (rest of the Netherlands) with presence/absence data for Graphoderus bilineatus. Tabel . Aantal onderzochte kilometerhokken met aanafwezigheid van Graphoderus bilineatus in  (ZuidHolland) en - (rest van Nederland). In both years sampling was concentrated between the end of April to the beginning of June and mid-August to the end of September. Within these periods the probability of catching adult beetles was highest, based on the available Dutch data. The aim was to re-investigate the localities where the species was found between  and , supplemented with any new findings in  and . As a starting point localities with records of adults and/or presumed larvae since  were selected from the  dataset (compiled by J. Huijbregts). The exact localities could most often be traced by the topographical descriptions on the labels, sometimes with assistance of the collector. The database contained  x kilometre squares (sometimes containing more than one locality) with reliable records of adult G. bilineatus since . All records of larvae were considered unreliable (Huijbregts ). In the  survey  localities were investigated in the province of Zuid-Holland with the Nieuwkoopse Plassen as the most important area (Cuppen ). A relatively large number of sampling localities in this survey were controls of localities with doubtful records of larvae or lost adult material. The study also included a number of localities which were obviously not suitable for G. bilineatus. The localities were divided in three groups according to the results of our survey: localities were G. bilineatus was found, localities were the species was not found but probably is  present (potential), and, finally, localities were the species was not collected and also is not expected. Sampling procedure Sampling was performed with a standard macrofauna net (width  cm, mesh size . mm), which was pushed over the bottom and through the vegetation, or scraped against the banks. The content of the net was emptied in a white tray and checked for Graphoderus. The locality was sampled up to a maximum period of . hours. Morphometrical measurements included depth and width or surface of a water body, and thickness of detritus/peat layers. The transparency and colour of the water and the amount of shade (by shrubs or trees) were visually assessed. A water sample was collected in a plastic bottle and the water was analysed for a number of parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, chlorinity, alkalinity and total hardness. The structure of the vegetation was assessed for all major layers (percentage cover): emergent, floating leaved, submerged, mosses and algae (flab). Special attention was paid to floating leaved and submerged plants, which were also assessed at the species level. More detailed information on sampling procedures can be found in Cuppen () and Cuppen & Koese ().  Distribution The distribution of G. bilineatus in the Netherlands is given in figure . The map is based on the  database, to which the results of the present investigation are added. It shows that prior to  the distribution area covered large parts of the Netherlands with the exception of the Delta region in the southwest, the northern coastal (often brackish) areas and large parts of the provinces of Drenthe and Overijssel. The actual distribution comprises only a minor part of the country with nearly all records confined to peat bog areas at the border of the provinces Utrecht, Zuid- and Noord-Holland in the centre of the Netherlands, and peat bogs in     ‒  ® ° l <   -  >  Figure . European distribution map of Graphoderus bilineatus (based on Foster ). Figuur . Verspreidingskaart van Graphoderus bilineatus gebaseerd op Foster (). Figure . Records of Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands (database -). Figuur . Vindplaatsen van Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland (bestand -). Noordwest-Overijssel and adjacent Friesland. The populations in heath land ponds on sandy soils in the southern, eastern and central parts of the Netherlands have severely declined during the last century. Only one, probably small, population remains in one of the Oisterwijkse Vennen. Table  gives a survey of the presence and absence of G. bilineatus in the kilometre squares investigated during the two projects. The species was found in about half the examined grid squares. The differences in recoveries between the two projects are mainly due to the different starting points. More details can be found in Cuppen () and Cuppen & Koese (). is permanent. Most often these waters are interconnected with each other within a certain area. Most water bodies in the Netherlands fulfil these requirements and it is obvious that the rarity of the species is not caused by rarity of these conditions. However, most other environmental variables investigated during this project vary considerably. For a correct interpretation of the results presented below it should be emphasized that, due to the goals of this project, the localities were not picked at random. Localities with records of G. bilineatus were strongly preferred. It is needless to say that measurements from hundreds of sampling localities without G. bilineatus could have been added to the dataset. In other countries Graphoderus bilineatus is frequently reported from isolated waters such as large ponds and lakes of various types (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Habitat Our study shows that in the Netherlands localities with Graphoderus bilineatus have in common that the water is (nearly) stagnant and the water    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Figure . Ditch in the Westbroekse Zodden, a typical locality for Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands. Photo B. Koese. Figuur . Sloot in de Westbroekse Zodden, een karakteristieke vindplaats van Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland. Foto B. Koese. Balke ). Only two of our records stem from more or less isolated waters: the Voorste Goorven near Oisterwijk and the Wijde Blik in the Naardermeer nature reserve. Both waters are very large in comparison with waters entering or leaving these lakes. The majority of Dutch records of G. bilineatus originate from ditches (fig. ) and canals. These waters show a considerable variation in width (fig. ). No obvious preference for any of the six classes can be detected. About % of the records is from ditches with a width less than  metres, quite a contrast with literature. The narrowest ditch had a width of only . meter. The distribution of the records over the different classes of water depth is given in figure . It  shows that G. bilineatus is more frequently observed in waters with a depth of more than  cm. This observation is in agreement with literature (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Balke ). The shallowest water depth measured was only  cm in a ditch at the Westbroekse Zodden in the summer period; in the winter the water level had risen to  cm. The soil at sampling localities with G. bilineatus consisted of either sand or peat with most often peaty, steep banks. The soil was covered by soft, muddy peat of a variable thickness, frequently more than  cm. Despite this peat, soils were never anaerobic, and the water itself was very clear or only slightly brown coloured by humic     ‒  - - - - - > Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to the width of the water body. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de breedte van de watergang. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to the depth of the water body. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de diepte van de watergang. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to pH. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de pH. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to electrical conductivity. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot electrisch geleidingsvermogen.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     According to Holmen () and Hendrich & Balke () the species tolerates weakly acid water, circumstances which are encountered in the Netherlands only in the Voorste Goorven with a pH between . and . at different stations and times. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to hardness. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot hardheid. compounds. Most localities were situated in the large seepage areas of the Netherlands, but this was hardly visible in the field (no milky or rusty water, no bacterial films at the water surface, indicative plants species e.g. Hottonia palustris were not common). Graphoderus bilineatus is an inhabitant of unshaded waters, which means that usually no trees or shrubs are growing on the banks. At some localities mowing activities were hindered by trees (most often at dead-ends of ditches), resulting in accumulation of trembling bog or a richer emergent vegetation, resulting in a better hidingplace for the beetles. Close to the banks the shading can increase considerably in the course of the season, due to the growth of helophytes on the banks. This of course also depends on the slope and exposition of the bank. Graphoderus bilineatus is most often observed in waters with a pH between  and . (fig. ), which seems to be the normal range abroad.  Electrical conductivity and chlorinity are strongly correlated in our dataset and therefore only the results for conductivity are presented (fig. ). Graphoderus bilineatus is observed in all classes except the highest (>  mS/m). A ‘preference’ for the lower three classes (<  mS/m) is obvious, above this value the presence of G. bilineatus rapidly declines. The hardness (ºD), a measure for the total amount of calcium and magnesium, shows that G. bilineatus is observed more in the lower three classes (<  ºD)(fig. ) than in the higher three. The structure, and to a lesser degree the composition, of the vegetation on the sampling localities is quite variable over the sample sites and also the season. In springtime (April-May) the water vegetation is usually sparsely developed and will be better developed in summer (AugustSeptember), when not cut. The emergent vegetation (only as far as it stands in the water) is sparsely developed with a cover of less than % by Phragmites australis, Carex paniculata, C. acuta, C. acutiformis and Thelypterus palustris as frequent and sometimes dominant species. Also the floating leaved vegetation (rooted as well as unrooted) is most often scarce, but occasionally Nuphar lutea, Nymphaea alba or Hydrocharis morsus-ranae are dominating. Potamogeton species are rare. Surface floating lemnids, though very frequent, are never dominant on localities with G. bilineatus. The submerged vegetation is well developed and often rather rich in species. Dominant and frequent is Utricularia vulgaris, less often Elodea canadensis, E. nuttallii, Ceratophyllum demersum, Potamogeton species, Stratiotes aloides, Hottonia palustris and Lemna trisulca. Mosses (mostly Sphagnum) and a floating layer of algae (flab) are sporadically present.     ‒  Figure . Predictive distribution model for Graphoderus bilineatus. In kilometre squares in peat bog areas (red), the probability of its occurrence is more than % based on electrical conductivity and associative plant species, in green squares the prediction is based only on electrical conductivity. Figuur . Voorspellend verspreidingsmodel voor Graphoderus bilineatus. In de rode kilometerhokken in de laagveengebieden is de kans op aantreffen van deze soort meer dan % gebaseerd op electrisch geleidingsvermogen en geässocieerde plantensoorten, in de groene hokken is deze voorspelling alleen gebaseerd op electrisch geleidingsvermogen.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Potential distribution model The development of the potential distributional model is reported in Sierdsema & Cuppen (). The final result is a map (fig. ) that can be used for future investigations. The map shows, for peat bog areas only, the kilometre squares (in red) in which G. bilineatus can be expected with a probability of more than %. This expectation is based on electrical conductivity of the water and the presence of associative plant species. In the green kilometre squares a probability of more than % for G. bilineatus is computed on the basis of electrical conductivity only. For these squares no floristical data were available. Green squares are mainly found in the northern part of the country.  In the first half of the th century G. bilineatus occurred in large parts of the Netherlands, lacking only in brackish areas. In the second half of the th century the species declined severely in all regions of our country except for peat bogs. The reasons for this decline surely include acidification of moorland pools by wet and dry acidic deposition, eutrophication by intensification of agriculture (use of artificial fertilizers), intensified use of herbicides and pesticides, re-allotment and intake of nearly brackish and hard river water (Rhine). Survival of G. bilineatus in peat bog areas is probably due to seepage, resulting in a good water quality (poor in nutrients, relatively low conductivity and total hardness). Also the relatively low economic value of these areas for agriculture reduced some of the above mentioned human influences. The peat bog areas, functioning as nature reserves, recreation areas or sources of natural products (fish, reeds) have changed relatively little during the last century. The improvement of water management in some of the areas (stopping, reducing and/or dephosphatizing of river water taken in) probably has resulted in (re)colonization of the Naardermeer, Weerribben, Wieden and Nieuwkoopse Plassen by G. bilineatus in the last decade of the th  century. Most of these areas were not very well investigated for invertebrates in the past but at least for the Naardermeer the restoration is well documented. Eight sites were sampled more or less regularly for invertebrates from  onwards. Dephosphatizing of intake water from the IJmeer took place from  onwards but, after problems in the initial stage, was effective from  onwards (Boosten ). Graphoderus bilineatus was first recorded in  at one site, followed by a second and third site in  (pers. com. G. van Ee). Prior to the discovery of Graphoderus, the water turbidity strongly declined resulting in clear water that enabled the development of a closed submerged vegetation including stoneworts (Characeae) and Najas marina. The distribution model predicts for the peat bog regions in the Netherlands the occurrence of G. bilineatus in  x kilometre squares with a probability of more than % (fig. ). A research project directed on especially these grid squares can improve the known distribution of the species in the Netherlands most succesfully. The predictive model can be validated by use of consistent sampling techniques and fixed time schedules. For the validation the assessment of the model parameters (electrical conductivity, number of associative aquatic plant species) is necessary. Many grid squares in the northern peat bog areas are deficit in floristical data. It is advised to gather these floristical data first and to add them to the model. Hereafter, examination of the grid squares with the highest potentials for G. bilineatus can be conducted. The predictive distribution model is based on measurements, maps and expert judgement. A major restriction of the model is its limitation to peat bog soils. To find new localities with G. bilineatus outside this area one can rely only on expert judgement. It is recommended to include in a new research project at least some heath land ponds in areas inhabited by the species in former days. Heath land ponds with an unaltered water table, not acidified nor eutrophicated, seem to be the best ones to look for.     ‒   We like to thank everyone (Natuurmonumenten, State Forestry Service, Water Authority Boards) who made it possible to investigate the status of Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands by giving us permits for collecting and access, boats, petrol, and information on localities. Gert van Ee provided information on several localities in the province of Noord-Holland. We thank Theodoor Heijerman for the nice photo. Menno Reemer and Vincent Kalkman (-Nederland) were very helpful with providing us with permits, and editing, arrangement and adding of text and illustrations to parts of manuscripts.  Bameul, F. . Les coléoptères aquatiques des Marais de la Perge (Gironde), témoins de la fin des temps glaciaires en Aquitane. – Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France : -. Boosten, A. (red.) . Monitoring Herstelplan Naardermeer -. Herstelplan van het Naardermeer door bundeling van krachten. – Vereniging Natuurmonumenten, ’s-Graveland. [-rapport -] Bosmans, R. & J. van Stalle . Distribution of Noterinae, Laccophilinae and Dytiscinae (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in East and West Flanders. – Annales de la Société royale zoologique de Belgique : -. Cuppen, J.G.M. . De gestreepte waterroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus in Zuid-Holland. – European Invertebrate Survey - Nederland, Leiden. Cuppen, J.G.M. & B. Koese . De gestreepte waterrroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland: een eerste inhaalslag. – European Invertebrate Survey - Nederland, Leiden. Deding, J. . Gut content analysis of diving beetles (Coleoptera; Dytiscidae). – Natura Jutlandica : -. Denton, J.S. . The spangled water beetle Graphoderus zonatus (Hoppe). The distribution and ecology of the larva. – English Nature Research Reports : -. Dopagne, Cl. . . Dytiscidae. – Enumeratio Coleopterorum Belgicae : -. Foster, G.N. . Graphoderus bilineatus (DeGeer, ). – In P.J. van Helsdingen, L.P.M. Willemse & M.C.D. Speight (eds), Background information on invertebrates of the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention. Part  - Crustacea, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden: -. Galewski, K. . Descriptions of the unknown larvae of the genera Hydaticus Leach and Graphoderus Dejean (Col., Dytiscidae) with some data on their biology. – Annales Zoologici, Warszawa : -. Galewski, K. . The larvae of Central European species of Graphoderus Dejean (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). – Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne : -. Haesloop, U. . Neue Schwimmkäfer (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) im Großraum Bremen. – Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Bremen : -. Hendrich, L. & M. Balke . Verbreitung, Habitatbindung, Gefährdung und mögliche Schutzmaßnahmen der -Arten Dytiscus latissimus Linnaeus,  (Der Breitrand) und Graphoderus bilineatus (De Geer, ) in Deutschland (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Insecta, Berlin : -. Holmen, M. . Fredede insekter  Danmark. Del : Biller knyttet til vand. – Entomologiske Meddelelser : -. Huijbregts, J. . Beschermde kevers in Nederland (Coleoptera). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -. Koese, B. & J.G.M. Cuppen . Sampling methods for Graphoderus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -. Nieukerken, E.J. van . Dytiscidae (waterroofkevers). – In M.B.P. Drost, H.P.J.J. Cuppen, E.J. van Nieukerken & M. Schreijer (red.), De waterkevers van Nederland (Coleoptera).  Uitgeverij, Utrecht: -. Nilsson, A.N. & M. Holmen . The aquatic Adephaga (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. . Dytiscidae. – Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica : -.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Olsvik, H. . Graphoderus bilineatus (DeGeer, ) (Col., Dytiscidae), new to Norway. – Fauna Norvegica, Series B : . Queney, P. . Liste taxonomique des Coléoptères ‘aquatique’ de la faune de France. – Le Coléoptériste  () supplément: -. Ribera, I, . Fauna Ibérica, el reino animal en la península Ibérica y las islas Baleares. – www.fauna-iberica.mncn.csic.es [bekeken op .iv.] Schaeflein, H. . Familie: Dytiscidae, echte Schwimmkäfer. – Die Käfer Mitteleuropas : -. Sierdsema, H. & J.G.M. Cuppen . A predictive distribution model for Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -.  Verspreiding en biotopen van Graphoderus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) De verspreiding en biotopen van de gestreepte waterroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus zijn in  en  onderzocht in opdracht van de provincie Zuid-Holland en het Ministerie van . Deze waterroofkever is wettelijk beschermd middels de Flora- en Faunawet en de Habitatrichtlijn. Graphoderus bilineatus kwam vroeger in grote delen van Nederland voor, maar is tegenwoordig vrijwel beperkt tot de grote laagveengebieden in de provincies Friesland, Overijssel, Utrecht en Noord- en Zuid-Holland. De belangrijkste biotopen in Nederland zijn sloten en kanalen met een breedte tussen , en  meter, een diepte tussen  en  centimeter met helder water, en meestal een vrij spaarzame vegetatie van drijvende en submerse waterplanten. Uit het buitenland is G. bilineatus vooral bekend uit grotere wateren. Op basis van een verspreidingsmodel wordt voor de laagveengebieden van ons land het potentiële voorkomen van G. bilineatus voorspeld. In  kilometerhokken voorspelt het model de aanwezigheid van deze soort met een waarschijnlijkheid van meer dan %. J.G.M. Cuppen Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group Wageningen University and Research Centre Ritzema Bosweg a   Wageningen jan.cuppen@wur.nl B. Koese -Nederland Postbus    Leiden eis@naturalis.nl H. Sierdsema  Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology / -University of Amsterdam / Alterra-Wageningen University and Research Centre Rijksstraatweg    Beek-Ubbergen henk.sierdsema@sovon.nl      ‒ 
    GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS    (: ) Jan Cuppen, Bram Koese & Henk Sierdsema The dytiscid beetle Graphoderus bilineatus is heavily protected by national and international law. In  and  more information was gathered on the exact distribution and habitat in the Netherlands. A century ago the species was present in large parts of the country, but nowadays it proves to be restricted to peat bog areas in the provinces of Friesland, Overijssel, Utrecht, and Zuid- and Noord-Holland. The main habitat is ditches and canals with a width between . and  m, a depth between  and  cm, with clear water and a sparse vegetation. A distribution model predicts the presence of G. bilineatus with a probability of % or more in  kilometre squares in peat bog areas.  The water beetle Graphoderus bilineatus (Degeer, ) (fig. ) is one of the five Dutch beetle species protected by the European Habitats Directive and Dutch Flora- and Faunalaw . Notwithstanding the national and international protection status the distribution of G. bilineatus in the Netherlands was poorly known. The publication of Huijbregts () can be considered the first step towards a better knowledge. The discovery by the second author of a new population of G. bilineatus in the Nieuwkoopse Plassen in  was reason for the province of ZuidHolland to request -Nederland to start a study on the status of the species in this province. This project was carried out in  (Cuppen ). On request of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, the status of G. bilineatus in other parts of the Netherlands was investigated in  and  (Cuppen & Koese ). In this paper we provide general information on the species with detailed notes on distribution and habitat. posterior to the middle. The main colour of the dorsal side are pale yellow and black, the ventral side is pale yellow. The main differences with Graphoderus cinereus (Linnaeus, ) (fig. ) and G. zonatus (Hoppe, ) (fig. ), the two other Dutch Graphoderus species, are:  The pale yellow transverse band on the middle of the pronotum is distinctly broader than the black bands at the posterior and anterior margins; in the other species the black bands are broader.  The epipleura of the elytra show a distinct constriction at the level of the hind margin of the first sternite, which is absent in both other species; here the epipleura taper gradually from base to apex.  The light parts of the dorsal and ventral side are pale yellow, in both other species these parts are more yellowish with traces of orange, especially at the underside of the abdomen. Graphoderus bilineatus can be easily identified with the commonly used keys such as Schaeflein (), Van Nieukerken () or Nilsson & Holmen ().  Graphoderus bilineatus (fig. ) is a middle-sized dytiscid beetle with a length of - mm. The body is broadly oval with its maximum width  The development of the egg, three larval instars and pupa takes about -. month (Galewski    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     & Holmen , Hendrich & Balke ), but we did not find concrete records of this phenomenon. Figure . Graphoderus bilineatus. Foto Theodoor Heijerman. Figuur . Graphoderus bilineatus. Photo Theodoor Heijerman. ), from mid May to the beginning of October (Foster ). The presence of third instar larvae in the first decade of June even suggests an earlier start of reproduction than mid May in the Netherlands. Also, two couples of G. bilineatus, collected on  April  and  May  respectively, did not mate nor did lay eggs in captivity. However, it seems unlikely that these activities had already taken place. The larvae pupate on land, in a shallow pupation room under mosses, stones, wood, or plant debris, not far from the water’s edge. The lifecycle is probably univoltine, the adults dying after the reproduction period. Not much is known about hibernation, possibly on land (Hendrich & Balke  under reference to Foster ) as well as under water (Nilsson & Holmen ). Foster () suggests hibernation between dense, submerged moss carpets, but actual observations are lacking. The species is reported to be able to fly (Nilsson  Adults and larvae are carnivorous, feeding on small invertebrates. The larval morphology suggests that the larvae feed on cladocerans in open water (Galewski ), like the younger instars of Graphoderus zonatus (Denton ). When this resource is limited the young larvae spend more time near the bottom in search of other prey items, as do the older instars, which are also frequently hunting in dense submerged vegetation. Food preferences of the adult beetle are not known for certain as crop contents never have been investigated. The crops of Graphoderus cinereus contained, apart from tissue of higher plants, Chlorophycaeae and Bacillariophycaeae, remains of Crustacea, Ephemeroptera and Chironomidae (Deding ). However, only four larvae were investigated and possibly the vegetable matter is not consumed by the beetle itself but by its prey (e.g. ephemeropterans or chironomids).  The range of Graphoderus bilineatus reaches from Central-Europe via East-Europe to western Siberia and from northern Italy, Austria, Hungary and Romania to southern Scandinavia (fig. ; based on Foster ). Nilsson & Holmen () also give Spain, but the species is not mentioned in the Spanish list (Ribera ). In the surrounding countries of the Netherlands G. bilineatus is very rare. It is present only in some regions in Germany (Hendrich & Balke ), France (Bameul , Foster , Queney ) and Belgium (Bosmans & Van Stalle , Dopagne ). In England the species has not been recorded for nearly a century and can be considered extinct (Foster ). In Norway it is recently recorded for the first time (Olsvik ). Graphoderus bilineatus is rare in Denmark, but widespread in Sweden and Finland (Holmen , Nilsson & Holmen ). Large     ‒  2 3 4 Figure -. Habitus of three Graphoderus species, . G. bilineatus, . G. cinereus, . G. zonatus. Collection Naturalis Leiden (). Photos Roy Kleukers. Figuur -. Habitus van drie Graphoderus-soorten, . G. bilineatus, . G. cinereus, . G. zonatus. Collectie Naturalis Leiden (). Foto’s Roy Kleukers. • Determination of the potential distribution area in the Netherlands • Finding reliable characters to separate the larvae of Graphoderus species populations are known from the south of Scandinavia, Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (Hendrich & Balke ). In West- and CentralEurope the species seems to have declined in the second half of the th century (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Balke , Huijbregts ). Despite this decline, new populations have recently been discovered in this area, e.g. in the surroundings of Bordeaux (Bameul ), Bremen (Haesloop ) and in several nature reserves in the Netherlands (Huijbregts , Cuppen , Cuppen & Koese ). In this paper we will focus on the first goal, distribution and habitat. The results with respect to the different sampling techniques are presented in a second paper (Koese & Cuppen ), the development of the distribution model in a third (Sierdsema & Cuppen ). The study of the larvae is still in progress and will be published later.    The main goals of the project were: • Description of the current distribution and habitat of Graphoderus bilineatus • Determination of the best sampling procedure (macrofauna net versus bottle traps) Period and investigated areas The survey on Graphoderus bilineatus took place in the years  and . In total  samples were taken (distributed over  localities,  x kilometre squares and  x kilometre squares).    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Aanwezig Zuid-Holland Rest van Nederland   Afwezig   Table . Number of kilometre squares investigated in  (province of Zuid-Holland) and - (rest of the Netherlands) with presence/absence data for Graphoderus bilineatus. Tabel . Aantal onderzochte kilometerhokken met aanafwezigheid van Graphoderus bilineatus in  (ZuidHolland) en - (rest van Nederland). In both years sampling was concentrated between the end of April to the beginning of June and mid-August to the end of September. Within these periods the probability of catching adult beetles was highest, based on the available Dutch data. The aim was to re-investigate the localities where the species was found between  and , supplemented with any new findings in  and . As a starting point localities with records of adults and/or presumed larvae since  were selected from the  dataset (compiled by J. Huijbregts). The exact localities could most often be traced by the topographical descriptions on the labels, sometimes with assistance of the collector. The database contained  x kilometre squares (sometimes containing more than one locality) with reliable records of adult G. bilineatus since . All records of larvae were considered unreliable (Huijbregts ). In the  survey  localities were investigated in the province of Zuid-Holland with the Nieuwkoopse Plassen as the most important area (Cuppen ). A relatively large number of sampling localities in this survey were controls of localities with doubtful records of larvae or lost adult material. The study also included a number of localities which were obviously not suitable for G. bilineatus. The localities were divided in three groups according to the results of our survey: localities were G. bilineatus was found, localities were the species was not found but probably is  present (potential), and, finally, localities were the species was not collected and also is not expected. Sampling procedure Sampling was performed with a standard macrofauna net (width  cm, mesh size . mm), which was pushed over the bottom and through the vegetation, or scraped against the banks. The content of the net was emptied in a white tray and checked for Graphoderus. The locality was sampled up to a maximum period of . hours. Morphometrical measurements included depth and width or surface of a water body, and thickness of detritus/peat layers. The transparency and colour of the water and the amount of shade (by shrubs or trees) were visually assessed. A water sample was collected in a plastic bottle and the water was analysed for a number of parameters: pH, electrical conductivity, chlorinity, alkalinity and total hardness. The structure of the vegetation was assessed for all major layers (percentage cover): emergent, floating leaved, submerged, mosses and algae (flab). Special attention was paid to floating leaved and submerged plants, which were also assessed at the species level. More detailed information on sampling procedures can be found in Cuppen () and Cuppen & Koese ().  Distribution The distribution of G. bilineatus in the Netherlands is given in figure . The map is based on the  database, to which the results of the present investigation are added. It shows that prior to  the distribution area covered large parts of the Netherlands with the exception of the Delta region in the southwest, the northern coastal (often brackish) areas and large parts of the provinces of Drenthe and Overijssel. The actual distribution comprises only a minor part of the country with nearly all records confined to peat bog areas at the border of the provinces Utrecht, Zuid- and Noord-Holland in the centre of the Netherlands, and peat bogs in     ‒  ® ° l <   -  >  Figure . European distribution map of Graphoderus bilineatus (based on Foster ). Figuur . Verspreidingskaart van Graphoderus bilineatus gebaseerd op Foster (). Figure . Records of Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands (database -). Figuur . Vindplaatsen van Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland (bestand -). Noordwest-Overijssel and adjacent Friesland. The populations in heath land ponds on sandy soils in the southern, eastern and central parts of the Netherlands have severely declined during the last century. Only one, probably small, population remains in one of the Oisterwijkse Vennen. Table  gives a survey of the presence and absence of G. bilineatus in the kilometre squares investigated during the two projects. The species was found in about half the examined grid squares. The differences in recoveries between the two projects are mainly due to the different starting points. More details can be found in Cuppen () and Cuppen & Koese (). is permanent. Most often these waters are interconnected with each other within a certain area. Most water bodies in the Netherlands fulfil these requirements and it is obvious that the rarity of the species is not caused by rarity of these conditions. However, most other environmental variables investigated during this project vary considerably. For a correct interpretation of the results presented below it should be emphasized that, due to the goals of this project, the localities were not picked at random. Localities with records of G. bilineatus were strongly preferred. It is needless to say that measurements from hundreds of sampling localities without G. bilineatus could have been added to the dataset. In other countries Graphoderus bilineatus is frequently reported from isolated waters such as large ponds and lakes of various types (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Habitat Our study shows that in the Netherlands localities with Graphoderus bilineatus have in common that the water is (nearly) stagnant and the water    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Figure . Ditch in the Westbroekse Zodden, a typical locality for Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands. Photo B. Koese. Figuur . Sloot in de Westbroekse Zodden, een karakteristieke vindplaats van Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland. Foto B. Koese. Balke ). Only two of our records stem from more or less isolated waters: the Voorste Goorven near Oisterwijk and the Wijde Blik in the Naardermeer nature reserve. Both waters are very large in comparison with waters entering or leaving these lakes. The majority of Dutch records of G. bilineatus originate from ditches (fig. ) and canals. These waters show a considerable variation in width (fig. ). No obvious preference for any of the six classes can be detected. About % of the records is from ditches with a width less than  metres, quite a contrast with literature. The narrowest ditch had a width of only . meter. The distribution of the records over the different classes of water depth is given in figure . It  shows that G. bilineatus is more frequently observed in waters with a depth of more than  cm. This observation is in agreement with literature (Nilsson & Holmen , Foster , Hendrich & Balke ). The shallowest water depth measured was only  cm in a ditch at the Westbroekse Zodden in the summer period; in the winter the water level had risen to  cm. The soil at sampling localities with G. bilineatus consisted of either sand or peat with most often peaty, steep banks. The soil was covered by soft, muddy peat of a variable thickness, frequently more than  cm. Despite this peat, soils were never anaerobic, and the water itself was very clear or only slightly brown coloured by humic     ‒  - - - - - > Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to the width of the water body. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de breedte van de watergang. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to the depth of the water body. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de diepte van de watergang. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to pH. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot de pH. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to electrical conductivity. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot electrisch geleidingsvermogen.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     According to Holmen () and Hendrich & Balke () the species tolerates weakly acid water, circumstances which are encountered in the Netherlands only in the Voorste Goorven with a pH between . and . at different stations and times. Figure . Percentual distribution of sampling localities with or without Graphoderus bilineatus in relation to hardness. Figuur . Procentuele verdeling van monsterpunten met en zonder Graphoderus bilineatus met betrekking tot hardheid. compounds. Most localities were situated in the large seepage areas of the Netherlands, but this was hardly visible in the field (no milky or rusty water, no bacterial films at the water surface, indicative plants species e.g. Hottonia palustris were not common). Graphoderus bilineatus is an inhabitant of unshaded waters, which means that usually no trees or shrubs are growing on the banks. At some localities mowing activities were hindered by trees (most often at dead-ends of ditches), resulting in accumulation of trembling bog or a richer emergent vegetation, resulting in a better hidingplace for the beetles. Close to the banks the shading can increase considerably in the course of the season, due to the growth of helophytes on the banks. This of course also depends on the slope and exposition of the bank. Graphoderus bilineatus is most often observed in waters with a pH between  and . (fig. ), which seems to be the normal range abroad.  Electrical conductivity and chlorinity are strongly correlated in our dataset and therefore only the results for conductivity are presented (fig. ). Graphoderus bilineatus is observed in all classes except the highest (>  mS/m). A ‘preference’ for the lower three classes (<  mS/m) is obvious, above this value the presence of G. bilineatus rapidly declines. The hardness (ºD), a measure for the total amount of calcium and magnesium, shows that G. bilineatus is observed more in the lower three classes (<  ºD)(fig. ) than in the higher three. The structure, and to a lesser degree the composition, of the vegetation on the sampling localities is quite variable over the sample sites and also the season. In springtime (April-May) the water vegetation is usually sparsely developed and will be better developed in summer (AugustSeptember), when not cut. The emergent vegetation (only as far as it stands in the water) is sparsely developed with a cover of less than % by Phragmites australis, Carex paniculata, C. acuta, C. acutiformis and Thelypterus palustris as frequent and sometimes dominant species. Also the floating leaved vegetation (rooted as well as unrooted) is most often scarce, but occasionally Nuphar lutea, Nymphaea alba or Hydrocharis morsus-ranae are dominating. Potamogeton species are rare. Surface floating lemnids, though very frequent, are never dominant on localities with G. bilineatus. The submerged vegetation is well developed and often rather rich in species. Dominant and frequent is Utricularia vulgaris, less often Elodea canadensis, E. nuttallii, Ceratophyllum demersum, Potamogeton species, Stratiotes aloides, Hottonia palustris and Lemna trisulca. Mosses (mostly Sphagnum) and a floating layer of algae (flab) are sporadically present.     ‒  Figure . Predictive distribution model for Graphoderus bilineatus. In kilometre squares in peat bog areas (red), the probability of its occurrence is more than % based on electrical conductivity and associative plant species, in green squares the prediction is based only on electrical conductivity. Figuur . Voorspellend verspreidingsmodel voor Graphoderus bilineatus. In de rode kilometerhokken in de laagveengebieden is de kans op aantreffen van deze soort meer dan % gebaseerd op electrisch geleidingsvermogen en geässocieerde plantensoorten, in de groene hokken is deze voorspelling alleen gebaseerd op electrisch geleidingsvermogen.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Potential distribution model The development of the potential distributional model is reported in Sierdsema & Cuppen (). The final result is a map (fig. ) that can be used for future investigations. The map shows, for peat bog areas only, the kilometre squares (in red) in which G. bilineatus can be expected with a probability of more than %. This expectation is based on electrical conductivity of the water and the presence of associative plant species. In the green kilometre squares a probability of more than % for G. bilineatus is computed on the basis of electrical conductivity only. For these squares no floristical data were available. Green squares are mainly found in the northern part of the country.  In the first half of the th century G. bilineatus occurred in large parts of the Netherlands, lacking only in brackish areas. In the second half of the th century the species declined severely in all regions of our country except for peat bogs. The reasons for this decline surely include acidification of moorland pools by wet and dry acidic deposition, eutrophication by intensification of agriculture (use of artificial fertilizers), intensified use of herbicides and pesticides, re-allotment and intake of nearly brackish and hard river water (Rhine). Survival of G. bilineatus in peat bog areas is probably due to seepage, resulting in a good water quality (poor in nutrients, relatively low conductivity and total hardness). Also the relatively low economic value of these areas for agriculture reduced some of the above mentioned human influences. The peat bog areas, functioning as nature reserves, recreation areas or sources of natural products (fish, reeds) have changed relatively little during the last century. The improvement of water management in some of the areas (stopping, reducing and/or dephosphatizing of river water taken in) probably has resulted in (re)colonization of the Naardermeer, Weerribben, Wieden and Nieuwkoopse Plassen by G. bilineatus in the last decade of the th  century. Most of these areas were not very well investigated for invertebrates in the past but at least for the Naardermeer the restoration is well documented. Eight sites were sampled more or less regularly for invertebrates from  onwards. Dephosphatizing of intake water from the IJmeer took place from  onwards but, after problems in the initial stage, was effective from  onwards (Boosten ). Graphoderus bilineatus was first recorded in  at one site, followed by a second and third site in  (pers. com. G. van Ee). Prior to the discovery of Graphoderus, the water turbidity strongly declined resulting in clear water that enabled the development of a closed submerged vegetation including stoneworts (Characeae) and Najas marina. The distribution model predicts for the peat bog regions in the Netherlands the occurrence of G. bilineatus in  x kilometre squares with a probability of more than % (fig. ). A research project directed on especially these grid squares can improve the known distribution of the species in the Netherlands most succesfully. The predictive model can be validated by use of consistent sampling techniques and fixed time schedules. For the validation the assessment of the model parameters (electrical conductivity, number of associative aquatic plant species) is necessary. Many grid squares in the northern peat bog areas are deficit in floristical data. It is advised to gather these floristical data first and to add them to the model. Hereafter, examination of the grid squares with the highest potentials for G. bilineatus can be conducted. The predictive distribution model is based on measurements, maps and expert judgement. A major restriction of the model is its limitation to peat bog soils. To find new localities with G. bilineatus outside this area one can rely only on expert judgement. It is recommended to include in a new research project at least some heath land ponds in areas inhabited by the species in former days. Heath land ponds with an unaltered water table, not acidified nor eutrophicated, seem to be the best ones to look for.     ‒   We like to thank everyone (Natuurmonumenten, State Forestry Service, Water Authority Boards) who made it possible to investigate the status of Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands by giving us permits for collecting and access, boats, petrol, and information on localities. Gert van Ee provided information on several localities in the province of Noord-Holland. We thank Theodoor Heijerman for the nice photo. Menno Reemer and Vincent Kalkman (-Nederland) were very helpful with providing us with permits, and editing, arrangement and adding of text and illustrations to parts of manuscripts.  Bameul, F. . Les coléoptères aquatiques des Marais de la Perge (Gironde), témoins de la fin des temps glaciaires en Aquitane. – Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France : -. Boosten, A. (red.) . Monitoring Herstelplan Naardermeer -. Herstelplan van het Naardermeer door bundeling van krachten. – Vereniging Natuurmonumenten, ’s-Graveland. [-rapport -] Bosmans, R. & J. van Stalle . Distribution of Noterinae, Laccophilinae and Dytiscinae (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in East and West Flanders. – Annales de la Société royale zoologique de Belgique : -. Cuppen, J.G.M. . De gestreepte waterroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus in Zuid-Holland. – European Invertebrate Survey - Nederland, Leiden. Cuppen, J.G.M. & B. Koese . De gestreepte waterrroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus in Nederland: een eerste inhaalslag. – European Invertebrate Survey - Nederland, Leiden. Deding, J. . Gut content analysis of diving beetles (Coleoptera; Dytiscidae). – Natura Jutlandica : -. Denton, J.S. . The spangled water beetle Graphoderus zonatus (Hoppe). The distribution and ecology of the larva. – English Nature Research Reports : -. Dopagne, Cl. . . Dytiscidae. – Enumeratio Coleopterorum Belgicae : -. Foster, G.N. . Graphoderus bilineatus (DeGeer, ). – In P.J. van Helsdingen, L.P.M. Willemse & M.C.D. Speight (eds), Background information on invertebrates of the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention. Part  - Crustacea, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden: -. Galewski, K. . Descriptions of the unknown larvae of the genera Hydaticus Leach and Graphoderus Dejean (Col., Dytiscidae) with some data on their biology. – Annales Zoologici, Warszawa : -. Galewski, K. . The larvae of Central European species of Graphoderus Dejean (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). – Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne : -. Haesloop, U. . Neue Schwimmkäfer (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) im Großraum Bremen. – Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins zu Bremen : -. Hendrich, L. & M. Balke . Verbreitung, Habitatbindung, Gefährdung und mögliche Schutzmaßnahmen der -Arten Dytiscus latissimus Linnaeus,  (Der Breitrand) und Graphoderus bilineatus (De Geer, ) in Deutschland (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Insecta, Berlin : -. Holmen, M. . Fredede insekter  Danmark. Del : Biller knyttet til vand. – Entomologiske Meddelelser : -. Huijbregts, J. . Beschermde kevers in Nederland (Coleoptera). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -. Koese, B. & J.G.M. Cuppen . Sampling methods for Graphoderus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -. Nieukerken, E.J. van . Dytiscidae (waterroofkevers). – In M.B.P. Drost, H.P.J.J. Cuppen, E.J. van Nieukerken & M. Schreijer (red.), De waterkevers van Nederland (Coleoptera).  Uitgeverij, Utrecht: -. Nilsson, A.N. & M. Holmen . The aquatic Adephaga (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. . Dytiscidae. – Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica : -.    - GRAPHODERUS BILINEATUS     Olsvik, H. . Graphoderus bilineatus (DeGeer, ) (Col., Dytiscidae), new to Norway. – Fauna Norvegica, Series B : . Queney, P. . Liste taxonomique des Coléoptères ‘aquatique’ de la faune de France. – Le Coléoptériste  () supplément: -. Ribera, I, . Fauna Ibérica, el reino animal en la península Ibérica y las islas Baleares. – www.fauna-iberica.mncn.csic.es [bekeken op .iv.] Schaeflein, H. . Familie: Dytiscidae, echte Schwimmkäfer. – Die Käfer Mitteleuropas : -. Sierdsema, H. & J.G.M. Cuppen . A predictive distribution model for Graphoderus bilineatus in the Netherlands (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). – Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen : -.  Verspreiding en biotopen van Graphoderus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) De verspreiding en biotopen van de gestreepte waterroofkever Graphoderus bilineatus zijn in  en  onderzocht in opdracht van de provincie Zuid-Holland en het Ministerie van . Deze waterroofkever is wettelijk beschermd middels de Flora- en Faunawet en de Habitatrichtlijn. Graphoderus bilineatus kwam vroeger in grote delen van Nederland voor, maar is tegenwoordig vrijwel beperkt tot de grote laagveengebieden in de provincies Friesland, Overijssel, Utrecht en Noord- en Zuid-Holland. De belangrijkste biotopen in Nederland zijn sloten en kanalen met een breedte tussen , en  meter, een diepte tussen  en  centimeter met helder water, en meestal een vrij spaarzame vegetatie van drijvende en submerse waterplanten. Uit het buitenland is G. bilineatus vooral bekend uit grotere wateren. Op basis van een verspreidingsmodel wordt voor de laagveengebieden van ons land het potentiële voorkomen van G. bilineatus voorspeld. In  kilometerhokken voorspelt het model de aanwezigheid van deze soort met een waarschijnlijkheid van meer dan %. J.G.M. Cuppen Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group Wageningen University and Research Centre Ritzema Bosweg a   Wageningen jan.cuppen@wur.nl B. Koese -Nederland Postbus    Leiden eis@naturalis.nl H. Sierdsema  Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology / -University of Amsterdam / Alterra-Wageningen University and Research Centre Rijksstraatweg    Beek-Ubbergen henk.sierdsema@sovon.nl      ‒ 