Irradiated Pollen-Induced Parthenogenesis for Doubled Haploid Production in Sunflowers (Helianthus spp.)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Progeny Evaluation
2.2. Identification of Optimal Gamma Ray Doses with Higher Efficiency and Frequency in Inducing Parthenogenesis
2.3. Selection of Additional Male Pollinator Lines
2.4. DH Plant Production Using Emasculated Non-Male Sterile (ENMS) Cultivated Sunflower Lines
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Plant Materials
3.2. Pollen Irradiation, Pollination, Embryo Rescue, and Culture Media
3.3. Progeny Evaluation Using Morphological and Molecular Markers
3.4. Chromosome Counting
3.5. Emasculation for the Generation of Male-Sterile Female Parent
3.6. Statistical Analysis
- Mean percentages of parthenogenesis for CMS and ENMS sunflower crosses (Figure 4).
- Analysis of the mean percentages of parthenogenesis for CMS sunflower crosses: The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the differences among different Gy irradiation groups (for a detailed analysis, see Supplemental Table S3). Using CMS sunflower lines as female parents, results were obtained from 6 Gy irradiation groups (50 Gy, 100 Gy, 130 Gy, 150 Gy, 170 Gy, and 200 Gy). Because the sample sizes for 130 Gy, 150 Gy, 170 Gy, and 200 Gy were all below 5, and the Kruskal–Wallis test performs poorly, we combined the data of 130 Gy, 150 Gy, 170 Gy, and 200 Gy into one group and designated this group as 130+ Gy. In this analysis, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 50 Gy, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 100 Gy, and is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy. Other parameters include the following: = the population number ( = the size of sample (= 6, =10, , = total number of observations in all samples ( the sum of the ranks for sample (). The test statistics are as follows:
- Analysis of the mean percentages of parthenogenesis for ENMS sunflower crosses: For studies using ENMS sunflower lines as female parents (including one result obtained from CMS 291 × ANN1811), results were obtained for four Gy irradiation groups (100 Gy, 130 Gy, 150 Gy, and 200 Gy). Since the sample size for the 130 Gy, 150 Gy, and 200 Gy groups was small, the data of these three Gy types were combined into one group, designated as 130+ Gy. The Wilcoxon two-sample test was used to determine if the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy was higher than that of 100 Gy (for a detailed analysis, see Supplemental Table S3). In this analysis, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 100 Gy, represents the sample size of 130+ Gy, represents the sample size of 100 Gy, represents the rank summation of 130+ Gy, represents the rank summation of 100 Gy, and the test hypotheses are and . The test statistics are the minimum of and where , and = 7. The significance value . According to the table of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the critical region was 8. Since which is less than 8, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the analysis indicated that the mean percentage of parthenogenesis for 130+ Gy was significantly greater than that of 100 Gy.
- Overall success rates of parthenogenetic experiments for CMS and ENMS sunflower lines (Figure 5).
- Analysis of the overall success rates of parthenogenetic experiments for CMS sunflower crosses: To analyze the overall success rates of parthenogenetic experiments, the percentages of parthenogenesis were modified by multiplying a coefficient of the overall success rates of the experiments, and the Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze the equality of means (modified mean percentages of parthenogenesis) (for detailed a analysis, see Supplemental Table S3). In this analysis, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 50 Gy, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 100 Gy, and is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy. Other parameters include the following: = the population number ( = the size of sample (= 6, =10, , = the total number of observations in all samples ( the sum of the ranks for sample (). The test statistics are
- Analysis of the overall success rate of parthenogenetic experiments for ENMS sunflower crosses: To analyze the overall success rates of parthenogenetic experiments, the percentages of parthenogenesis were modified by multiplying a coefficient of the overall success rates of the experiments, and the Wilcoxon two-sample test was used to determine if the modified mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy is smaller than that of 100 Gy (for a detailed analysis, see Supplemental Table S3). In this analysis, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 130+ Gy, is the mean percentage of parthenogenesis of 100 Gy, represents the sample size of 130+ Gy, represents the sample size of 100 Gy, represents the rank summation of 130+ Gy, represents the rank summation of 100 Gy, and the test hypotheses are and . The test statistics are the minimum of and where , and = 36. The significance value . According to the table of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the critical region was 8. Since which is less than 8, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the analysis indicated that the success rate of parthenogenetic experiments for 130+ Gy was significantly smaller than that of 100 Gy.
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Germanà, M.A. Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2011, 104, 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prigge, V.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Babu, R.; Chen, S.; Atlin, G.N.; Melchinger, A.E. New insights into the genetics of in vivo induction of maternal haploids, the backbone of doubled haploid technology in maize. Genetics 2012, 190, 781–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dhooghe, E.; Van Laere, K.; Eeckhaut, T.; Leus, L.; Van Huylenbroeck, J. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2011, 104, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzoor, A.; Ahmad, T.; Bashir, M.A.; Hafiz, I.A.; Silvestri, C. Studies on colchicine induced chromosome doubling for enhancement of quality traits in ornamental plants. Plants 2019, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Weyen, J. Applications of doubled haploids in plant breeding and applied research. In Doubled Haploid Technology, Methods in Molecular Biology; Segui-Simarro, J.M., Ed.; Humana: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Volume 2287, pp. 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.; Wu, P.; Trampe, B.; Tian, X.; Lübberstedt, T.; Chen, S. Novel technologies in doubled haploid line development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Niazian, M.; Shariatpanahi, M.E. In Vitro-based doubled haploid production: Recent improvements. Euphytica 2020, 216, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinowska, K.; Chamas, S.; Unkel, K.; Demidov, D.; Lermontova, I.; Dresselhaus, T.; Kumlehn, J.; Dunemann, F.; Houben, A. State-of-the-art and novel developments of in vivo haploid technologies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.X.; Lespinasse, Y. Pollination with gamma-irradiated pollen and development of fruits, seeds and parthenogenetic plants in apple. Euphytica 1991, 54, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falque, M.; Kodia, A.; Sounigo, O.; Eskes, A.; Charrier, A. Gamma-irradiation of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) pollen: Effect on pollen grain viability, germination and mitosis and on fruit set. Euphytica 1992, 64, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caglar, G.; Abak, K. Progress in the production of haploid embryos, plants and doubled haploids in cucumber (C. sativus L.) by gamma irradiated pollen, in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 1999, 492, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
- Taşkın, H.; Yücel, N.K.; Baktemur, G.; Çömlekçioğlu, S.; Büyükalaca, S. Effects of different genotypes and gamma ray doses on haploidization with irradiated pollen technique in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 93, 1165–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri, L.; Lotfi, M.; Nori, M. Production of Haploid Embryos and Plants in Iranian Melon (Cucumis melo L.) through Irradiated Pollen-Induced Parthenogenesis. In Mutation Breeding, Genetic Diversity and Crop Adaptation to Climate Change; Sivasankar, S., Ellis, N., Jankuloski, L., Ingelbrecht, I., Eds.; CABI Books International: Wallingford, UK, 2021; pp. 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blinkov, A.O.; Varlamova, N.V.; Kurenina, L.V.; Khaliluev, M.R. The production of Helianthus haploids: A review of its current status and future prospects. Plants 2022, 11, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürel, A.; Kontowski, S.; Nichterlein, K.; Friedt, W. Embryogenesis in microspore culture of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia 1991, 14, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
- Todorova, M.; Dalhoff, M.; Friedt, W. Microspore culture in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 1993, 7, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coumans, M.; Zhong, D. Doubled haploid sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plant production by androgenesis: Fact or artifact? Part 2. In vitro isolated microspore culture. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 1995, 41, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorova, M.; Ivanov, P.; Shindrova, P.; Christov, M.; Ivanova, I. Doubled haploid production of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) through irradiated pollen-induced parthenogenesis. Euphytica 1997, 97, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorova, M.; Ivanov, P.; Nenova, N.; Encheva, J. Effect of female genotype on the efficiency of γ-induced parthenogenesis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Helia 2004, 27, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drumeva, M.; Berville, A.; Ivanov, P.; Nenova, N.; Encheva, J. Molecular investigations on the doubled haploid origin of sunflower lines (Helianthus annuus L.) developed through gamma-induced parthenogenesis. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2005, 19, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drumeva, M.; Yankov, P. Investigation on the parthenogenetic response of sunflower lines and hybrids. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015, 7, 415–418. [Google Scholar]
- Guichoux, E.; Lagache, L.; Wagner, S.; Chaumeil, P.; Léger, P.; Lepais, O.; Lepoittevin, C.; Malausa, T.; Revardel, E.; Salin, F.; et al. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Testillano, P.; Georgiev, S.; Mogensen, H.L.; Coronado, M.J.; Dumas, C.; Risueno, M.C.; Matthys-Rochon, E. Spontaneous chromosome doubling results from nuclear fusion during in vitro maize induced microspore embryogenesis. Chromosoma 2004, 112, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coe, E.H., Jr. A line of maize with high haploid frequency. Am. Nat. 1959, 93, 381–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacquier, N.M.A.; Gilles, L.M.; Martinant, J.P.; Rogowsky, P.M.; Widiez, T. Maize in planta haploid inducer lines: A cornerstone for doubled haploid technology. Methods Mol. Biol. 2021, 2288, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandey, K.K.; Phung, M. Hertwig effect in plants: Induced parthenogenesis through the use of irradiated pollen. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1982, 62, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukno, S.; Ruso, J.; Jan, C.C.; Melero-Vara, J.M.; Fernández-martínez, J.M. Interspecific hybridization between sunflower and wild perennial Helianthus species via embryo rescue. Euphytica 1999, 106, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Mulpuri, S.; Feng, J.; Vick, B.A.; Jan, C.C. Molecular mapping of the Rf3 fertility restoration gene to facilitate its utilization in breeding confection sunflower. Mol. Breed. 2012, 29, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.; Gulya, T.; Seiler, G.J.; Hulke, B.S.; Vick, B.A. Identification of resistance to new virulent races of rust in sunflowers and validation of DNA markers in the gene pool. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jan, C.C. Developing unique interspecific germplasm for sunflower improvement. Biotechnology & wild species. In Proceedings of the 14th International Sunflower Conference, Beijing-Shenyang, China, 12–20 June 1996; International Sunflower Association: Paris, France, 1996; pp. 1111–1116. Available online: https://www.isasunflower.org/fileadmin/documents/aProceedings/14thISC1996-2/Biotechnology/BIOTECHNOLOGY1111.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2023).
Cross | Gy | Pollination Date | Seed #/ Head # | Total # of Embroys Formed | Total # of Survived Plants | Survival Rate (%) | Total # of Plants with Green Hypocotyl | Percentage of Seedlings with Green Hypocotyl (%) | Offspring with Green Hypocotyl and Sterile Yellow Flowers | Total # of Plants with Female Parental Genotype | Percentage of Parthenogenesis (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
291 × 1440 | 50 | January 2017 | 738/6 | 508 | 170 | 33.46 | 5 | 2.94 | 2 | 2 | 1.18 |
291 × 1485 | 50 | June 2018 | 287/4 | 161 | 161 | 100.00 | 4 | 2.48 | 2 | 2 | 1.24 |
303 × 1440 | 50 | January 2017 | 1273/7 | 782 | 220 | 28.13 | 10 | 4.55 | 4 | 4 | 1.82 |
303 × 1440 | 50 | October 2017 | 805/2 | 606 | 606 | 100.00 | 12 | 1.98 | 4 | 5 | 0.83 |
303 × 1440 | 50 | February 2018 | 284/2 | 214 | 214 | 100.00 | 7 | 3.27 | 2 | 2 | 0.93 |
303 × 1440 | 50 | June 2018 | 480/4 | 370 | 370 | 100.00 | 4 | 1.08 | 0 | 1 | 0.27 |
291 × 1440 | 100 | October 2017 | 133/2 | 47 | 47 | 100.00 | 2 | 4.26 | 1 | 1 | 2.13 |
291 × 1440 | 100 | June 2018 | 284/4 | 82 | 82 | 100.00 | 3 | 3.66 | 1 | 1 | 1.22 |
291 × 1440 | 100 | October 2019 | 17/2 | 11 | 8 | 72.73 | 2 | 25.00 | 2 | 2 | 25.00 |
291 × 1485 | 100 | February 2018 | 47/2 | 21 | 21 | 100.00 | 2 | 9.52 | 1 | 1 | 4.76 |
291 × 1485 | 100 | June 2018 | 211/4 | 64 | 64 | 100.00 | 2 | 3.13 | 1 | 1 | 1.56 |
291 × 1485 | 100 | October 2019 | 77/2 | 28 | 7 | 25.00 | 1 | 14.29 | 1 | 1 | 14.29 |
303 × 1440 | 100 | February 2018 | 135/2 | 74 | 74 | 100.00 | 3 | 4.05 | 1 | 1 | 1.35 |
303 × 1440 | 100 | June 2018 | 331/4 | 200 | 200 | 100.00 | 3 | 1.50 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 |
303 × 1485 | 100 | February 2018 | 152/1 | 41 | 41 | 100.00 | 3 | 7.32 | 2 | 2 | 4.88 |
303 × 1485 | 100 | June 2018 | 100/4 | 45 | 45 | 100.00 | 5 | 11.11 | 2 | 2 | 4.44 |
291 × 1440 | 130 | February 2018 | 2312 | 8 | 8 | 100.00 | 1 | 12.50 | 1 | 1 | 12.50 |
303 × 1485 | 130 | June 2018 | 78/4 | 26 | 26 | 100.00 | 2 | 7.69 | 1 | 1 | 3.85 |
303 × 1440 | 150 | Juie 2018 | 47/4 | 20 | 20 | 100.00 | 5 | 25.00 | 3 | 4 | 20.00 |
303 × 1440 | 170 | October 2017 | 165/2 | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 1 | 11.11 | 1 | 1 | 11.11 |
291 × 1440 | 200 | June 2018 | 27/4 | 22 | 22 | 100.00 | 5 | 22.73 | 2 | 4 | 18.18 |
303 × 1440 | 200 | June 2018 | 14/4 | 7 | 7 | 100.00 | 1 | 14.29 | 1 | 1 | 14.29 |
Cross | Gy | Pollination Date | Seed #/Head # | Total # of Embroys Formed | Total # of Survived Plants | Survival Rate (%) | Total # of Plants with Green Hypocotyl | Percentage of Seedlings with Green Hypocotyl (%) | Offspring with Green Hypocotyl and Sterile Yellow Flowers | Total # of Plants with Female Parental Genotype | Percentage of Parthenogenesis (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMS 291 × ANN1811 | 100 | February 2019 | 21/2 | 14 | 6 | 42.86 | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 16.67 |
H6. 60 × 1440 | 100 | June 2019 | 9/2 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 1 | 16.67 | |
HA 60 × 1440 | 100 | October 2019 | 8/2 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 1 | 16.67 | |
HA 60 × ANN1811 | 100 | June 2019 | 11/2 | 6 | 6 | 100.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 1 | 16.67 | |
HA 60 × ANN1811 | 100 | October 2019 | 26/2 | 23 | 23 | 100.00 | 3 | 13.04 | 2 | 8.70 | |
HA 89 × 1440 | 100 | October 2019 | 26/2 | 16 | 16 | 100.00 | 5 | 31.25 | 1 | 6.25 | |
HA 89 × ANN1811 | 100 | June 2019 | 12/2 | 10 | 10 | 100.00 | 3 | 30.00 | 2 | 20.00 | |
HA 89 × ANN1811 | 100 | April 2020 | 35/6 | 23 | 23 | 100.00 | 4 | 17.39 | 4 | 17.39 | |
HA 60 × 1440 | 130 | October 2019 | 15/2 | 12 | 12 | 100.00 | 3 | 25.00 | 1 | 8.33 | |
HA 60 × ANN1811 | 150 | Aril 2020 | 11/4 | 9 | 9 | 100.00 | 2 | 22.22 | 2 | 22.22 | |
HA 89 × ANN1811 | 150 | April 2020 | 20/6 | 19 | 19 | 100.00 | 6 | 31.58 | 5 | 26.32 | |
HA 60 × ANN1811 | 200 | April 2020 | 8/4 | 4 | 4 | 100.00 | 1 | 25.00 | 1 | 25.00 | |
HA 89 × ANN1811 | 200 | April 2020 | 13/6 | 11 | 11 | 100.00 | 5 | 45.45 | 5 | 45.45 |
Female | Pollen Source | Gamma Ray Dose | Obtained DH Offspring |
---|---|---|---|
CMS 291 | G11/1440 | 50 Gy | 2 |
100 Gy | 4 | ||
130 Gy | 1 | ||
200 Gy | 4 | ||
CMS 291 | G11/1485 | 50 Gy | 2 |
100 Gy | 3 | ||
CMS 291 | ANN1811 | 100 Gy | 1 |
CMS 303 | G11/1440 | 50 Gy | 12 |
100 Gy | 3 | ||
150 Gy | 4 | ||
170 Gy | 1 | ||
200 Gy | 1 | ||
CMS 303 | G11/1485 | 100 Gy | 4 |
130 Gy | 1 | ||
HA 60 | G11/1440 | 100 Gy | 2 |
130 Gy | 1 | ||
HA 60 | ANN1811 | 100 Gy | 3 |
150 Gy | 2 | ||
200 Gy | 1 | ||
HA 89 | G11/1440 | 100 Gy | 1 |
HA 89 | ANN1811 | 100 Gy | 6 |
150 Gy | 5 | ||
200 Gy | 5 | ||
Total | 69 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, H.; Hou, H.; Jan, C.-C.; Chao, W.S. Irradiated Pollen-Induced Parthenogenesis for Doubled Haploid Production in Sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Plants 2023, 12, 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132430
Wang H, Hou H, Jan C-C, Chao WS. Irradiated Pollen-Induced Parthenogenesis for Doubled Haploid Production in Sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Plants. 2023; 12(13):2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132430
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Hongxia, Hongyan Hou, Chao-Chien Jan, and Wun S. Chao. 2023. "Irradiated Pollen-Induced Parthenogenesis for Doubled Haploid Production in Sunflowers (Helianthus spp.)" Plants 12, no. 13: 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132430